Steven P 11:55 Fri Jul 27
Whyte v Parker
|
|
Anyone watching this tomorrow?
50/50 fight and quite hard to call. Im going for Whyte!
Anyone else?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
stewie griffin
6:30 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Oh, and he list EMPHATICALLY to John MCDERMOTT
One of the worst decisions ever seen in a British ring.
|
stewie griffin
6:29 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
He s like you at the MEN, son?
Been dumped on his arse by some seriously shit fighters. People very quickly forget he was a laughing stock before the klitschko fight , which was a hideous spectacle when klitschko didn't throw a right hand all night. He magically became the premier heavyweight of his era whilst going mental for 3 years. He would haven't smashed in a rematch and he'll get smashed by the first decent fighter he comes up against.
|
busheyhammer85
6:20 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
stewie griffin 3:14 Mon Jul 30
Behave SON!! Haha
|
Pub Bigot
4:15 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Griff, he's not great to watch in the ring, but in my opinion, he's head and shoulders above anyone in that division, at least technically.
|
LeroysBoots
3:25 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Crassus 1:51 Sun Jul 29
Spot on, I sat and watched every fight sine it started on Sky, most excellent evening's entertainment.
a word for Anna Woolhouse, apart form being a real sort she's also superb at presenting boxing, a real find for Sky
|
stewie griffin
3:14 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Fury is fucking toilet
|
Pub Bigot
2:55 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
There's not many great boxers in the division to begin with. Aside form Fury, who is a proper boxer? Ortiz?
The WBC Champion is a windmill artist, so you don't need to be a great boxer in the division and I'd have Whyte all day over Wilder.
|
Gavros
2:46 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Whyte wasn't good, he's a dreadful boxer.
Parker was a chickenshit. That's all there is to it.
|
Pub Bigot
2:39 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Agree with Bushy, Value for money, even if it wasn't expected.
I tuned in from Connor Benn's fight, so not sure what was like before that. I did see Dave Allen's overhand right on TWITTER, which was a fucking rocket!
|
busheyhammer85
2:31 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
That was as good a show as I've ever seen Saturday.
|
Biggie Biggs
1:31 Mon Jul 30
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Mace66 2:59 Sun Jul 29
|
Mace66
2:59 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Robson 1.45
I’ve read some shit on this site over the years and that is right up there
|
Mace66
2:56 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Got on Chisora at 7/2 just before the ko but lost it on Parker, Whyte much better than I thought he was.
|
Crassus
1:51 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Hearn inherited the cunt gene but to be fair, the bloke puts on a show
Top stuff that, considering it was not true headline
Clever bit from Hearn is that this will only make the headline even bigger
Classic marketing
|
Pagey
1:48 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Two decent fights tonight and there have been a few decent fights over the last couple of years too.
Sky Bet had a boost of Whyte to win after being knocked down at 14/1. Bet they were gutted with that finale!
|
Robson
1:45 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Clicked on this thread genuinely thinking we must have signed someone called Whyte and people were comparing him to Parker.
Boxers are they? Who the f**k watches boxing these days? Been s**t since Sky came along and Bruno retired!
|
Eerie Descent
1:38 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Sorry wurzel, I'm just winding up Gavros.
The big Christmas jumper pansy.
|
Gavros
1:37 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
That fight went exactly as I was predicting on here earlier.
|
wurzel
1:37 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Haye the fraud
|
wurzel
1:34 Sun Jul 29
Re: Whyte v Parker
|
Eh? I've heard more sense coming out of my dogs arse than that last post.
|
| 
